Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Integrated perc 5/i

From: tyrrill_ed(at)emc(dot)com
To: <miki(at)epoch(dot)co(dot)il>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Date: 2007-08-16 17:30:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi Miki,
I am using a Dell 2950, and I recently switched from using RAID 5 of all
six disks to three RAID 1 pairs with the OS on the first pair, postgres
on the second except for pg_xlog, which I moved to the third pair.  This
configuration change increased the insert performance of my application
by 40%.  I have not tried RAID 10 so I cannot help you there.  My
suggestion is test both RAID 5 and RAID 10, and report back to us what
you find.


From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:27 AM
To: PostgreSQL Performance
Subject: [PERFORM] Integrated perc 5/i


I wanted to know if the integrated perc 5/i which come with Dell 2950
will yield maximum performance from RAID 10 ( 15K SAS ).
Or should I ask for different card ?

I read an old post that shows that RAID 10 does not work eficently under
perc 5/i

Does any one have any experience with RAID 10 & perc 5/i ?


Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and  Director. - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Michael Ben-NesDate: 2007-08-16 17:47:25
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-08-16 17:01:24
Subject: Re: Bad planner decision - bitmap scan instead of index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group