|From:||Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com|
|Subject:||Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
(2019/01/21 21:09), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2019/01/21 20:56), amul sul wrote:
>> 0003 patch need a rebase.
> Will do.
While doing the rebase, I noticed that 0002 would not be necessary
anymore; what was originally proposed by it on how to generate the
tlists for child-joins in  is entirely included in commit
7cfdc77023ad50731723e85c215a4127436ed09c, which I pushed. I didn't pay
attention to this thread, but that was pretty much the same as what I
did in that commit (except the handling of PHVs to avoid extra work in
that commit), so I think I should have mentioned about that in the
commit message. Sorry for that, Ashutosh.
Here is an updated version of the patchset. As above, I don't think
0002 is necessary; it added copy_pathtarget to build_child_join_rel, but
I think it would be redundant because we do create_empty_pathtarget at
the top of that function and then build_child_join_reltarget. Also, it
added an assertion to build_joinrel_tlist, but I don't think it's really
necessary IMO. So I removed it entirely from the patchset. No changes
Will continue to review.
|Next Message||Fabien COELHO||2019-01-22 12:43:18||Re: Alternative to \copy in psql modelled after \g|
|Previous Message||David Rowley||2019-01-22 12:34:46||Re: pg_dump multi VALUES INSERT|