Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Machine available for community use

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Machine available for community use
Date: 2007-07-31 03:36:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 19:14 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> and RHEL performed much better than CentOS.

>> Not to be unkind, but I doubt that on an identical configuration.

> Each test took 1-2 days -- I will insist that CentOS performs poorer
> than RHEL.

I'm finding that hard to believe too.  There isn't any "secret sauce"
in the RHEL build process --- the CentOS guys should have been able to
duplicate the RHEL RPMs exactly.  Now it's possible that CentOS had
lagged in updating some performance-relevant package; did you compare
package versions across both OSes?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Arjen van der MeijdenDate: 2007-07-31 05:16:10
Subject: Re: Reducing stats collection overhead
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-07-31 03:07:07
Subject: Re: Reducing stats collection overhead

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group