| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Date: | 2007-07-31 03:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5913.1185852994@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 19:14 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> and RHEL performed much better than CentOS.
>> Not to be unkind, but I doubt that on an identical configuration.
> Each test took 1-2 days -- I will insist that CentOS performs poorer
> than RHEL.
I'm finding that hard to believe too. There isn't any "secret sauce"
in the RHEL build process --- the CentOS guys should have been able to
duplicate the RHEL RPMs exactly. Now it's possible that CentOS had
lagged in updating some performance-relevant package; did you compare
package versions across both OSes?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2007-07-31 05:16:10 | Re: Reducing stats collection overhead |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-07-31 03:07:07 | Re: Reducing stats collection overhead |