| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian Ceccarelli <bceccarelli(at)net32(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5611: SQL Function STABLE promoting to VOLATILE |
| Date: | 2010-08-11 15:18:26 |
| Message-ID: | 5912.1281539906@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Brian Ceccarelli <bceccarelli(at)net32(dot)com> writes:
> STABLE no longer means STABLE. This behavior is killing my performance. I am getting 500% to 30000% increase in latency.
You seem to be under the illusion that "stable" is a control knob for a
function result cache. It is not, and never has been. Postgres doesn't
do function result caching.
If you've constructed your app in such a way that it depends on not
inlining SQL set-returning functions, it's fairly easy to defeat that.
>From memory, marking a SRF as either strict or volatile will do it
(although volatile might cause you problems elsewhere --- I suspect
your design is pretty brittle in this area).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-11 15:32:52 | Re: BUG #5611: SQL Function STABLE promoting to VOLATILE |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-11 15:10:45 | Re: BUG #5612: Database Integrity |