Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target

From: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: "daniel(at)yesql(dot)se" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target
Date: 2021-09-01 16:12:44
Message-ID: 58e27103037f395678eeeb0acf51c787b4b18bfe.camel@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2021-08-27 at 15:02 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 12:08:16AM +0000, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > (Things would get hairier if someone included the SSL Makefile
> > somewhere else, but I don't see anyone doing that now and I don't know
> > why someone would.)
>
> That would not happen. Hopefully.

:)

> FWIW, I'll try to spend a
> couple of hours on what you had upthread in 0002 for the
> simplification of SSL stuff generation and see if I can come up with
> something.

Thanks! The two-patch v3 no longer applies so I've attached a v4 to
make the cfbot happy.

--Jacob

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-test-ssl-rework-the-sslfiles-Makefile-target.patch text/x-patch 92.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniele Varrazzo 2021-09-01 16:25:29 Is it safe to use the extended protocol with COPY?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2021-09-01 16:05:18 Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table