Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kurt Stam" <kstam(at)apache(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid
Date: 2010-11-10 17:42:51
Message-ID: 5895.1289410971@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Kurt Stam" <kstam(at)apache(dot)org> writes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JUDDI-374

There is no evidence whatsoever on that page to demonstrate that there's
any such postgresql bug. What's more, simple testing suggests that PG
is perfectly happy with timestamps of 2100 or even further out. If
you'd like us to believe we have something to fix, please exhibit some
SQL commands that deliver an incorrect result.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 18:57:27 Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-10 17:36:15 Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?