Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: archive wal's failure and load increase.
Date: 2006-09-28 21:28:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Cedric Boudin <cedric(at)dreamgnu(dot)com> writes:
> So the question is: is there a correlation between not getting the wal's
> archived and this "massive" load growth?

Shouldn't be.  Do you want to force the condition again and try to see
*where* the cycles are going?  "High load factor" alone is a singularly
useless report.  Also, how many unarchived WAL files were there?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: BenDate: 2006-09-28 22:18:56
Subject: any hope for my big query?
Previous:From: Carlo StonebanksDate: 2006-09-28 21:04:31
Subject: Re: Performace Optimization for Dummies

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group