Why we lost Uber as a user

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Why we lost Uber as a user
Date: 2016-07-26 16:54:55
Message-ID: 579795DF.10502@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


The following article is a very good look at some of our limitations and
highlights some of the pains many of us have been working "around" since
we started using the software.



* Inefficient architecture for writes
* Inefficient data replication
* Issues with table corruption
* Poor replica MVCC support
* Difficulty upgrading to newer releases

It is a very good read and I encourage our hackers to do so with an open



Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-07-26 19:13:41 old_snapshot_threshold allows heap:toast disagreement
Previous Message Robbie Harwood 2016-07-26 16:24:39 Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support