| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
| Date: | 2008-04-02 17:00:46 |
| Message-ID: | 5769.1207155646@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> That cat is already out of the bag with every Linux distribution.
> There's just no point in our going three sides around the square in
> order to have someone, somewhere claim that our tarball isn't
> violating their law.
[shrug...] It's not exactly terribly complicated to keep this stuff
in a contrib module.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-02 17:05:14 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-04-02 16:55:09 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-02 17:05:14 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-04-02 16:55:09 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |