Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Date: 2016-03-05 19:11:53
Message-ID: 56DB2F79.1060805@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/28/2016 07:45 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> If there are no other complaints or comments, I will commit the attached
>> sometime this coming week (the the requisite catversion bump).
>
> Thanks for the updated patch, I have nothing else to say on my side.
> The new version has fixed the MSVC build, I just double-checked it.

Pushed with catversion bump.

Thanks,

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-03-05 19:12:15 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Previous Message Greg Stark 2016-03-05 18:32:58 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification