| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: SET ROLE hook |
| Date: | 2016-02-29 01:40:06 |
| Message-ID: | 56D3A176.5000600@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/07/2016 09:08 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 10:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think a design that was actually somewhat robust would require two
>> hooks, one at check_role and one at assign_role, wherein the first one
>> would do any potentially-failing work and package all required info into
>> a blob that could be passed through to the assign hook.
Attached.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| setrole_hook-2016.02.28.00.diff | text/x-diff | 1.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-02-29 02:23:10 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding support for sequence advances |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2016-02-29 01:30:40 | Re: pg_ctl promote wait |