| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
| Date: | 2016-02-05 04:01:06 |
| Message-ID: | 56B41E82.6090107@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/02/04 19:44, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> I just started reviewing this and realized that patch is not getting applied
> cleanly on latest source, it having some conflicts. Can you please upload
> the correct version of patch.
I rebased the patch to the latest HEAD. Attached is a rebased version
of the patch. You don't need to apply the patch
fdw-foreign-modify-rmh-v2.patch attached before.
Thanks for the review!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fdw-dml-pushdown-v6.patch | application/x-patch | 91.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2016-02-05 04:03:36 | Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW) |
| Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-02-05 03:50:36 | Re: Way to check whether a particular block is on the shared_buffer? |