Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Date: 2016-02-05 04:01:06
Message-ID: 56B41E82.6090107@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/02/04 19:44, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> I just started reviewing this and realized that patch is not getting applied
> cleanly on latest source, it having some conflicts. Can you please upload
> the correct version of patch.

I rebased the patch to the latest HEAD. Attached is a rebased version
of the patch. You don't need to apply the patch
fdw-foreign-modify-rmh-v2.patch attached before.

Thanks for the review!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment Content-Type Size
fdw-dml-pushdown-v6.patch application/x-patch 91.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2016-02-05 04:03:36 Re: Odd behavior in foreign table modification (Was: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW)
Previous Message Kouhei Kaigai 2016-02-05 03:50:36 Re: Way to check whether a particular block is on the shared_buffer?