On 2016/02/03 3:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Etsuro Fujita wrote: > >> Done. Attached is an updated version of the patch. > > Pushed, thanks.
> I kinda wonder why this struct member has a name that doesn't match the > naming convention in the rest of the struct, and also why isn't it > documented in the comment above the struct definition. But that's not > this patch's fault.