Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support

From: Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Improvements of Hunspell dictionaries support
Date: 2016-01-28 12:00:46
Message-ID: 56AA02EE.6090004@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sorry, I don't know why this thread was moved to another thread.

I duplicate the patch here.

> On 28.01.2016 14:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Artur Zakirov wrote:
>>
>>> I undo the changes and the error will be raised. I will update the patch
>>> soon.
>>
>> I don't think you ever did this. I'm closing it now, but it sounds
>> useful stuff so please do resubmit for 2016-03.
>>
>
> I'm working on the patch. I wanted to send this changes after all changes.
>
> This version of the patch has a top-level comment. Another comments I will provides soon.
>
> Also this patch has some changes with ternary operators.
>
>> I don't think you ever did this. I'm closing it now, but it sounds
>> useful stuff so please do resubmit for 2016-03.
>
> Moved to next CF.

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
hunspell_dict_v5.patch text/x-patch 29.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-28 12:24:02 Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-01-28 11:51:52 Re: Proposal:Use PGDLLEXPORT for libpq