Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin

From: Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removing service-related code in pg_ctl for Cygwin
Date: 2016-01-19 08:45:08
Message-ID: 569DF794.8070500@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/01/2016 18:32, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/14/2016 12:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Beginning a new thread seems more adapted regarding $subject but
>> that's mentioned here as well:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQXghm_SdB5iniupz1atzMxk=95gv9A8ocdo83SXCNjeg@mail.gmail.com
>>
>>

>>
>> Marco, as I think you do some packaging for Postgres in Cygwin, and
>> others, does that sound acceptable?
>>
>
>
>
> I think we can be a bit more adventurous and remove all the
> Cygwin-specific code. See attached patch, which builds fine on buildfarm
> cockatiel.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>

builds fine also here on 64bit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-19 09:29:22 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2016-01-19 08:34:21 Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept