Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL

From: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GIN pending list clean up exposure to SQL
Date: 2016-01-10 12:24:21
Message-ID: 56924D75.7060801@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29/12/2015 00:30, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I'll prepare a patch for core for the January commitfest, and see if
>> it flies. If not, there is always the extension to fall back to.
>
> Here is an updated patch. I've added type and permission checks,
> docs, and some regression tests.
>

I just reviewed it. Patch applies cleanly, everything works as intended,
including regression tests.

I think the function should be declared as strict.

Also, there are some trailing whitespaces in the documentation diff.

Regards.

> Cheers,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>

--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-10 13:57:32 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Blind attempt at a Cygwin fix
Previous Message David Rowley 2016-01-10 10:17:56 Re: Spelling corrections