Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-30 14:58:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
> On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
>> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
>> will keep that in code committors plate.

> I have no opinion on this to one way or the other, so I'm fine with 
> waiting for someone else (possibly the committer) to decide this.

FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Amit KapilaDate: 2013-01-30 15:02:23
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-01-30 14:55:21
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group