Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
> On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
>> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
>> will keep that in code committors plate.
> I have no opinion on this to one way or the other, so I'm fine with
> waiting for someone else (possibly the committer) to decide this.
FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Amit Kapila||Date: 2013-01-30 15:02:23|
|Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation|
|Previous:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2013-01-30 14:55:21|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables|