Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_trgm

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
Subject: Re: pg_trgm
Date: 2010-05-30 14:41:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> This is still ignoring the point: arbitrarily changing the module's
>> longstanding standard behavior isn't acceptable.  You need to provide
>> a way for the user to control the behavior.  (Once you've done that,
>> I think it can be just either "alnum" or "!isspace", but maybe some
>> other behaviors would be interesting.)

> To be honest I don't know what "module's longstanding standard
> behavior" should be. It's not documented anywhere.

Well, that's a documentation problem rather than an argument for
changing the code.

> If you mean that is
> whatever the current implementation is, then any effort to touch the
> module should be prohibited.

I don't think it's unreasonable to insist that behavioral changes be
made in an upward compatible fashion ... especially ones that seem as
least as likely to break some current usages as to enable new usages.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-05-30 14:46:44
Subject: Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.
Previous:From: Jan UrbaƄskiDate: 2010-05-30 14:41:40
Subject: Re: tsvector pg_stats seems quite a bit off.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group