Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED
Date: 2013-01-15 23:22:59
Message-ID: 5626.1358292179@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Perhaps I'm taking a bit too narrow view of the world, but my thinking
> is OLTP won't want things compressed, as it increases latency of
> requests, while OLAP users are operating with enough data that they'll
> go through the effort to use COPY.

Also, if there are so many people using COPY in their apps, why have we
never seen any submitted patches to extend libpq with functions to
construct/deconstruct COPY data? Surely somebody would have said to
themselves that they shouldn't be responsible for knowing those escaping
rules.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-01-15 23:26:01 Re: Curious buildfarm failures (fwd)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-15 23:19:27 Re: Parallel query execution