Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: add label to enum syntax

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: add label to enum syntax
Date: 2010-10-25 20:31:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> LABEL is already an unreserved keyword, and I'm pretty sure that's all 
> we'll need.

The only reason it's a keyword is the SECURITY LABEL patch that went
in a month or so ago; which is syntax that might still be thought
better of before it gets to a release.

But I seem to be in the minority, so I'll shut up now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: James CloosDate: 2010-10-25 20:35:23
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2010-10-25 20:28:57
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group