| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal documentation |
| Date: | 2019-07-10 15:26:04 |
| Message-ID: | 54779de5-f922-c0cf-629d-b582eded7265@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 7/10/19 10:24 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> +1 to document this caveat.
>
> How about
> Note that while WAL will be flushed with this setting,
> <application>pg_receivewal</application> never applies it, so
> <xref linkend="guc-synchronous-commit"/> must not be set to
> <literal>remote_apply</literal> if <application>pg_receivewal</application>
> is the only synchronous standby.
> ?
>
Sure.
Best regards,
Jesper
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4_pgreceivewal-doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-07-10 15:44:27 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2019-07-10 15:05:49 | Re: Index Skip Scan |