On 12.9.2014 22:24, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote: >> >> Yes, I like those changes and I think your reasoning is correct in both >> cases. It certainly makes the method shorter and more readable - I was >> too "stuck" in the original logic, so thanks for improving this. >> >> So +1 from me to those changes. > > OK, committed. Please rebase the rest.
Attached is v15 of the patch, rebased to current HEAD.