|From:||Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>|
|To:||Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>|
|Subject:||Re: PL/PgSQL: EXIT USING ROLLBACK|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 7/28/14 11:27 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 26 July 2014 18:14, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
>> Today I'd like to present a way to get rid of code like this:
> You haven't explained this very well... there is nothing that explains
> WHY you want this.
> In the absence of a good explanation and a viable benefit, I would
> vote -1 for this feature suggestion.
Yes, I did a poor job in the original email, but I did explain my
> Yes, you can already do this with RAISE but that seems more like an
> accident than anything else. I feel a dedicated syntax is less error
> prone and makes the intent clearer to people reading the code. But I
> realize I might be in the minority with this.
I guess -3, +0 is enough that I'll be dropping the patch. Thanks to
everyone who had a look.
|Next Message||Kyotaro HORIGUCHI||2014-07-28 09:47:57||Re: Use unique index for longer pathkeys.|
|Previous Message||Simon Riggs||2014-07-28 09:27:02||Re: PL/PgSQL: EXIT USING ROLLBACK|