| From: | Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PoC: full merge join on comparison clause |
| Date: | 2018-11-21 13:02:47 |
| Message-ID: | 5351b58a-99ca-65fe-4bcd-7739bfedae33@postgrespro.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/19/18 04:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short, proceeding like the above when we can't find another plan
> type for a full join seems like it fixes a far wider variety of cases.
> The possibility that maybe we could do some of those cases a bit faster
> isn't sufficiently attractive to me to justify also putting in a
> mechanism like this patch proposes. We only rarely see complaints at
> all about can't-do-a-full-join problems, and I do not think this patch
> would fix enough of those complaints to be worthwhile.
I agree, the automated UNION substitutions seems to be a better
approach. I'll mark this patch as rejected then.
--
Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2018-11-21 13:28:01 | Re: [PATCH] Pass COPT and PROFILE to CXXFLAGS as well |
| Previous Message | Alexander Kuzmenkov | 2018-11-21 12:54:20 | Re: Removing unneeded self joins |