Re: GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2014-04-04 15:34:09
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/08/2014 10:40 PM, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> Fourth version of the patch attached. It is rebased to the HEAD (8879fa0).
> Operator name formatting patch rebased on top of it. I will put
> the selectivity estimation patch to the next commit fest.
> This version of the patch does not touch to the btree_gist extension,
> does not set the operator class as the default. It adds support to
> the not equals operator to make the operator class compatible with
> the btree_gist extension.

The patch looks good but it does not apply anymore against master. If
you could fix that and the duplicate OIDs I think this is ready for a


In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Костя Кузнецов 2014-04-04 15:56:19 gsoc knn spgist
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-04-04 15:33:56 Re: jsonb is also breaking the rule against nameless unions