Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: page compression

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: page compression
Date: 2010-12-28 15:50:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
>> I know its been discussed before, and one big problem is license and patent
>> problems.
>> Would this project be a problem:
> It looks like even liblzf is not going to be accepted. I have proposed
> to only link against liblzf if available for pg_dump and have somehow
> failed, see:

I thought that was mostly about not wanting multiple changes in one patch. I don't see why liblzf would be objectionable in general.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: tvDate: 2010-12-28 15:55:12
Subject: Re: estimating # of distinct values
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-12-28 15:34:53
Subject: Re: pg_primary_conninfo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group