Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support
Date: 2018-01-25 14:07:40
Message-ID: 5182ee18-1d71-56e0-2eb5-dd171240085a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/19/18 13:43, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Comparing the existing {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c with the proposed
> {be,fe}-secure-gnutls.c, and with half an eye on the previously proposed
> Apple Secure Transport implementation, I have identified a few more
> areas of refactoring that should be done in order to avoid excessive
> copy-and-pasting in the new implementations:

And here is another place that needs cleaning up, where the OpenSSL API
was used directly.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Use-abstracted-SSL-API-in-server-connection-log-mess.patch text/plain 5.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-25 14:10:02 Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2018-01-25 14:01:46 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.