Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

From: Zoltán Böszörményi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: 'Craig Ringer' <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'Ants Aasma' <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Amit kapila' <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
Date: 2013-01-30 14:45:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2013-01-30 15:29 keltezéssel, Zoltán Böszörményi írta:
> 2013-01-28 15:20 keltezéssel, Hari Babu írta:
>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:23 AM Amit kapila wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 19, 2013 4:13 AM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Unfortunately, I won't have time to do anything with my lock_timeout
>> patch
>>>> for about 3 weeks. Does anyone have a little spare time to test it on
>> Windows?
>>> I shall try to do it, probably next week.
>>> Others are also welcome to test the patch.
>> I have carried out some windows testing of the lock timeout patch.
> Thanks very much. It means it didn't crash for you and
> it waited the expected amount of time as well.
>> The extra tests which are carried out on the patch are attached in 
>> the mail.
> The patch itself contained regression tests to run by itself
> and compete with statement_timeout as well, although
> it waits only 2 seconds instead of 60 as in your test.
>> Some observations on the patch:
>> 1. Patch needs a rebase as it causing some rejections.
> On a fresh GIT pull, it only caused a reject for the documentation
> parts of the patch. No other rejects and no fuzz, only line shift
> warnings were indicated by the patch. Anyway, a refreshed one
> is attached.
>> 2. regress check failed because the expected ".out" file is not updated
>> properly.
> Which regress check failed? The .out file was updated in the patch
> for prepared_xacts.sql where the regression tests for lock_timeout
> were added. Or do you mean the one for the sql file you sent?

If the failed regression test is indeed the prepared_xacts.sql that is
in my patch, can you attach the regression.diff file after the failed
"make check"? Thanks.

> Thanks,
> Zoltán Böszörményi

Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-01-30 14:55:21
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous:From: Zoltán BöszörményiDate: 2013-01-30 14:29:04
Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group