Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-30 09:29:10
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> Looks good this time.
> Will mark "Ready for committor"

Thanks for reviewing it more carefully than I did! :-)  And my apologies 
for the confusion earlier.

> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
> will keep that in code committors plate.

I have no opinion on this to one way or the other, so I'm fine with 
waiting for someone else (possibly the committer) to decide this.

Marko Tiikkaja

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2013-01-30 09:48:40
Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous:From: Jeevan ChalkeDate: 2013-01-30 06:52:33
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group