Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl idempotent option

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_ctl idempotent option
Date: 2013-01-30 05:07:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>>> I don't think I like --force because it isn't clear if we are forcing
>>> the start to have done something, or forcing the server to be running.
> Do we need this idempotent feature for "stop" too?

Yes, of course.

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alexander LawDate: 2013-01-30 06:00:01
Subject: Re: BUG #7493: Postmaster messages unreadable in a Windows console
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2013-01-30 04:04:11
Subject: Re: passing diff options to pg_regress

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group