| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log |
| Date: | 2013-01-16 23:38:25 |
| Message-ID: | 50F739F1.9060602@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/16/2013 05:59 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking into this as a committer. It seems that this is the
> newest patch and the reviewer(Pavel) stated that it is ready for
> commit. However, I noticed that this patch adds a Linux/UNIX only
> feature(not available on Windows). So I would like to ask cores if
> this is ok or not.
I haven't been following the thread, but if the complaint is that
Windows doesn't have accurate high-resolution timers, which is what it
kinda looks like from the rest of your message, then it's not true.
Every version since Windows2000 has had
QueryPerformanceCounter()/QueryPerformanceFrequency(). And we use it:
see src/include/portability/instr_time.h
If that's not the problem, then can someone please point me at the
message that sets the problem out clearly, or else just recap it?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-16 23:42:33 | Re: Event Triggers: adding information |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-01-16 23:31:44 | Re: [PATCH] COPY .. COMPRESSED |