Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-16 19:55:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> If we decide to fold CF3 and CF4 together, either we lose that step
> (which would make me sad, it seems like a good idea) or we need to
> figure another way to work it into the process.

Well, we should have the triage discussion ASAP then.  We were really
supposed to have it a week ago.

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.

In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-16 19:28:05 from Tom Lane


  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-16 20:13:50 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2013-01-16 20:04:45
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2013-01-16 19:28:05
Subject: Re: CF3+4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group