Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views

From: Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date: 2013-01-10 14:24:42
Message-ID: 50EECF2A.1030806@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/10/13 3:22 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For versions >= 9.2 it would be better to allow passing in a
> pretty-print value, like 80 or 0, instead of just passing 'true'. The
> new line-wrapping that the integer argument triggers is much more
> readable than the supposedly pretty value that 'true' provides.

Ooh, I had no idea we exposed that in SQL. I like this idea.

Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-10 14:56:58 Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-01-10 14:22:46 Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views