On 1/7/2013 1:10 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro
> <yamamuro(dot)takeshi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
>> >Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my
>> >opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation
>> >in pg_lzcompress.
> So why don't we use LZ4?
what will changing compression formats do for compatability?
this is for the compressed data in pg_toast storage or something? will
this break pg_upgrade style operations?