On 1/3/13 12:30 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with
>> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one.
>> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :)
> Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
> better way to do this in the future.
It does seem like a hack. Couldn't this be implemented with a backend
Also, as a small practical matter, since this is a server-side program
(since it's being used as archive_command), we shouldn't put it into the
pg_basebackup directory, because that would blur the lines about what to
install where, in particular for the translations.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dong Ye||Date: 2013-01-04 18:53:32|
|Subject: Re: dynamic SQL - possible performance regression in 9.2|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2013-01-04 18:07:37|
|Subject: Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation