Re: parallel pg_dump

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel pg_dump
Date: 2012-12-08 16:13:30
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/08/2012 11:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> On 2012-10-15 17:13:10 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 10/13/2012 10:46 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> On 09/17/2012 10:01 PM, Joachim Wieland wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Attached is a rebased version of the parallel pg_dump patch.
>>>> Attached is another rebased version for the current commitfest.
>>> These did not apply cleanly, but I have fixed them up. The combined diff
>>> against git tip is attached. It can also be pulled from my parallel_dump
>>> branch on <> This builds and
>>> runs OK on Linux, which is a start ...
>> Well, you would also need this piece if you're applying the patch (sometimes
>> I forget to do git add ...)
> The patch is marked as Ready for Committer in the CF app, but at least
> the whole windows situation seems to be unresolved as of yet?
> Is anybody working on this? I would *love* to get this...

I am working on it when I get a chance, but keep getting hammered. I'd
love somebody else to review it too.



In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2012-12-08 16:16:47 Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2012-12-08 16:07:38 Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction