From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Pedro J(dot) Lobo" <pjlobo(at)euitt(dot)upm(dot)es>, PostgreSQL bugs mailing list <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL ports mailing list <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc |
Date: | 1999-10-08 23:01:04 |
Message-ID: | 5092.939423664@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> New code in Makefile.alpha is:
> /* some platforms define __alpha, but not __alpha__ */
> #if defined(__alpha) && !defined(__alpha__)
> #define __alpha__
> #endif
OK, so we're going to standardize on __alpha__ to recognize that
platform? OK by me, unless the Alpha users know a reason not to.
But the above doesn't belong in Makefile.alpha does it? I'd have
thought include/port/alpha.h, since __alpha__ is being looked for
by C code not makefiles.
BTW, a quick glimpse shows no occurrences of __alpha except in
contrib/int8/int8.c, which is presumably unmaintained dead code now
that int8 is in the mainstream. Shouldn't we delete contrib/int8
entirely?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-09 01:30:47 | Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-08 17:14:10 | Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-09 01:30:47 | Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-08 17:14:10 | Re: [BUGS] 6.5.2 broken on alpha/Tru64 Unix 4.0d/cc |