Re: Stalled post to pgsql-hackers

From: Tim Hart <tjhart(at)mac(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Subject: Re: Stalled post to pgsql-hackers
Date: 2002-06-27 06:58:41
Message-ID: 50918358-899B-11D6-93E5-000393460410@mac.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Begin forwarded message:

I said:
> BTW - Oracle & other commercial vendors handle these contingencies by
> buying insurance policies.

I think I should probably correct the above statement. I think Oracle
specifically has a large enough revenue stream that they have no need to
purchase an insurance policy. It is technically possible for them, or
any other vendor, to do so if they chose to. Many insurance companies
offer insurance products to offset the legal responsibility for the
performance of a software package. Many such policies are sold each year.

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-06-27 07:08:14 Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)
Previous Message Tim Hart 2002-06-27 06:52:22 Fwd: Support (was: Democracy and organisation)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-06-27 07:08:14 Re: [HACKERS] Support (was: Democracy and organisation)
Previous Message Tim Hart 2002-06-27 06:52:22 Fwd: Support (was: Democracy and organisation)