Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs to do simple sanity
Date: 2005-11-06 22:31:37
Message-ID: 5051.1131316297@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 2005-06-11 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (gist still needs the same treatment.)

> If you're planning on doing the same for GiST (or if there's some reason
> it can't easily be done), let me know -- otherwise I'll look into doing
> that.

I'm on it now, just felt like committing what I had ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-06 22:39:21 pgsql: Add simple sanity checks on newly-read pages to GiST, too.
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-11-06 21:51:04 Re: pgsql: Add defenses to btree and hash index AMs