Re: Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Would like to contribute a section to docs for 9.3. Where to start?
Date: 2012-08-17 20:03:42
Message-ID: 502EA39E.4040301@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 8/15/12 5:33 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> So here is a very rough draft. I would be interested in feedback as to
> inaccuracies or omissions. I would like to get the technical side right
> before going into an editorial phase.
>
> Any feedback on the technical side?

[citation needed]

Seriously, if we are trying to justify our use of seemingly standard
academic terms, we should have some references to where those are
defined or at least discussed. Otherwise we are just begging the
question: PostgreSQL is object-relational because we say so.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2012-08-17 20:29:54 Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-08-17 19:51:44 Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example