|From:||Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>|
|To:||Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>|
|Subject:||Re: Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
> I'll have a v2 in a little bit --- the cfbot pointed out that there
> were some contrib tests I'd missed fixing, and I found a couple of
> other improvements.
Here 'tis. This passes check-world, unlike v1 (mea culpa for not
checking that). I also cleaned up the variant expected-files,
so it's now no worse than HEAD as far as failures in serializable
I played a bit more with insert-conflict-specconflict.spec, too.
It now seems proof against delays inserted anywhere in the
regards, tom lane
|Next Message||Peter Geoghegan||2021-06-15 21:12:27||Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more.|
|Previous Message||Peter Geoghegan||2021-06-15 20:00:08||Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops|