| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Improving the isolationtester: fewer failures, less delay |
| Date: | 2021-06-15 21:09:00 |
| Message-ID: | 501471.1623791340@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I'll have a v2 in a little bit --- the cfbot pointed out that there
> were some contrib tests I'd missed fixing, and I found a couple of
> other improvements.
Here 'tis. This passes check-world, unlike v1 (mea culpa for not
checking that). I also cleaned up the variant expected-files,
so it's now no worse than HEAD as far as failures in serializable
mode go.
I played a bit more with insert-conflict-specconflict.spec, too.
It now seems proof against delays inserted anywhere in the
lock-acquiring subroutines.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| improve-isolationtester-2.patch | text/x-diff | 157.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-15 21:12:27 | Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-06-15 20:00:08 | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops |