Re: ODBC driver further developments?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>
Cc: <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ODBC driver further developments?
Date: 2004-04-05 09:31:01
Message-ID: 50109.80.177.99.193.1081157461.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

It's rumoured that Shachar Shemesh once said:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>At the moment we have 3 builds, the ODBC2.5 (legacy) version, the ODBC3
>>version and the ODBC3 Unicode (beta) version. I want to move fairly
>>quickly to only the ODBC3 Unicode build and junk the rest.
>>
>>Regards, Dave
>>
>>
> Does that mean that you have officially picked up the ODBC maintanance?
> That's great news. I was fearing it will be left orphaned.

No, it means I will continue applying the odd patch, managing releases and
the website despite the fact I no longer use the driver much. In other
words, if others can code and help review patches, I can continue to do
the rest for the time being.
> Are you interested in my list of gripes with the current code, btw?

Depends how contructive it is :-). Seriously though, what do folks think
about switching on the bug tracker on the Gborg project sdo these things
can be tracked?
Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-04-05 09:32:39 Re: invalid input syntax for type tid: '(,)'
Previous Message Shachar Shemesh 2004-04-05 08:31:42 Re: ODBC driver further developments?