| From: | SINGHAL Harsh <harsh(dot)singhal(at)cy-play(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sequence id NOT incremented as expected |
| Date: | 2012-07-20 14:18:20 |
| Message-ID: | 500968AC.80404@cy-play.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks a lot, Tom.
--
Harsh Raj SINGHAL
Cy-Play
On 20/07/12 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> SINGHAL Harsh <harsh(dot)singhal(at)cy-play(dot)com> writes:
>> * In an increasing sequence whose max value is set to
>> 9223372036854775807 and cycle option is activated, as shown above,
>> from 2147483647 to 9223372036854775807 it is displaying error
>> "ERREUR: entier en dehors des limites" and after that it resets it
>> to 1 which is normal for any sequence whose cycle option is activated.
> You didn't show us any context here, but this sounds like you're trying
> to store the sequence's result into a integer (not bigint) column.
> If so, that's not a bug, it's just pilot error.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-07-20 18:13:39 | Re: Re: BUG #6712: PostgreSQL 9.2 beta2: alter table drop constraint does not work on inherited master table |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-20 14:08:49 | Re: Sequence id NOT incremented as expected |