| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | <frank_lupo(at)email(dot)it> |
| Cc: | <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <myeatman(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Qeustion pgadmin2 develop |
| Date: | 2003-04-02 12:54:59 |
| Message-ID: | 50067.80.177.99.193.1049288099.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Frank,
It's rumoured that frank_lupo once said:
> Hi Dave
>
> There are many new functionalities for pgadmin2 that I would want to
> develop.
I wonder if it has sense to make them or of it it is worth
> the pain.
How much time will want that the pgadmin3 before to us
> usable?
> I see that the development and much assets.
> What I must make?
This is something that is of concern to me. pga2 is by no means useless or
at a dead-end, yet I want to concentrate on pga3 as it will allow us to go
cross platform, and handle Unicode - 2 very popular requests which are
seriously hindering pga2
pgAdmin 3 is a fair way from being usable, not least because I have so
little time at the moment. On the other hand, Andreas and Keith have both
been working hard. Realistically, I think it is likely to be 3 - 6 months
before pga3 has the features of pga2 v1.2.
So, I am happy to do a 1.6 release of pga2 seeing as you have put in so
much effort with useful new features. I will leave it up to you to decide
when you have done enough now - just let me know and I'll look at doing a
beta release.
In the long term, if you know C++, it would be great to have your input on
pga3.
What do you (and Mark, Jean-Michel, Keith, Andreas - and anyone else I
forgot) think?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2003-04-02 13:20:07 | Re: pgadmin3 query tools |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-04-02 12:44:55 | Re: pgadmin3 query tools |