Re: partition tree inspection functions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan(dot)ladhe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date: 2018-10-30 01:53:43
Message-ID: 4eaf3516-49e5-f963-e137-3d63a3ca3fa6@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/10/30 10:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks for the new version and using better index names. I have
> reviewed and committed the patch, with a couple of things tweaked:
> - removal of the tests on the size, they don't seem useful as part of
> showing partition information.
> - no need to join on pg_class for the test of the normal table.
> - added some comments and reformulated some other comments.
> - added a test with a materialized view.
> - added a test with a NULL input (as that's a strict function).

Thank you!

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-30 02:39:31 Re: Conflicting option checking in pg_restore
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2018-10-30 01:36:54 pgbench doc fix