Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date: 2017-02-25 17:27:36
Message-ID: 4e730f28-742b-45e9-d507-4d292fbd7834@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/25/2017 12:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think it'd be better to leave DirectFunctionCallN alone and just invent
> a small number of CallerFInfoFunctionCallN support functions (maybe N=1
> and N=2 would be enough, at least for now).
>
>

See attached.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
callfinfofunctioncall2.patch text/x-diff 2.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2017-02-25 17:54:24 Reduce lock levels for reloptions
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2017-02-25 17:14:55 Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums