| From: | Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New GUC to sample log queries |
| Date: | 2018-07-16 20:19:11 |
| Message-ID: | 4b243757-8d8d-8306-1979-f39db645d3ae@anayrat.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/16/2018 05:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Vik Fearing
> <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hmm. Not sure if that last word should be _sample, _sampling, _rate, or
>> a combination of those.
>
> +1 for rate or sample_rate. I think "sample" or "sampling" without
> "rate" will not be very clear.
>
Thanks,
After reading this mail :
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180710183828.GB3890%40telsasoft.com
I wonder if this GUC could be used for theses logging method?
log_statement_stats
log_parser_stats
log_planner_stats
log_executor_stats
--
Adrien
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-16 20:36:51 | Re: ENOSPC FailedAssertion("!(RefCountErrors == 0)" |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-16 20:14:09 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |