Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux

From: Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux
Date: 2012-06-29 17:14:40
Message-ID: 4FEDE280.8080604@schokola.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> You need at the very, very least 10s.
ok, thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-06-29 17:20:02 change_varattnos_of_a_node versus whole-row Vars
Previous Message Andres Freund 2012-06-29 17:11:51 Re: Update on the spinlock->pthread_mutex patch experimental: replace s_lock spinlock code with pthread_mutex on linux