Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-27 00:40:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 06/26/2012 07:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar jun 26 18:58:45 -0400 2012:
>> Even if you actively try to configure the shmem settings to exactly
>> fill shmmax (which I concede some installation scripts might do),
>> it's going to be hard to do because of the 8K granularity of the main
>> knob, shared_buffers.
> Actually it's very easy -- just try to start postmaster on a system with
> not enough shmmax and it will tell you how much shmem it wants.  Then
> copy that number verbatim in the config file.  This might fail on picky
> systems such as MacOSX that require some exact multiple or power of some
> other parameter, but it works fine on Linux.

Except that we have to account for other installers. A user can install 
an application in the future which clobbers the value and then the 
original application will fail to run. The options to get the first app 
working is:

a) to re-install the first app (potentially preventing the second app 
from running)
b) to have the first app detect the failure and readjust the value 
(guessing what it should be) and potentially forcing a reboot
c) to have the the user manually adjust the value and potentially force 
a reboot

The failure usually gets blamed on the first application.

That's why we had to nuke SysV shmem.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-06-27 00:44:46
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Previous:From: A.M.Date: 2012-06-27 00:37:17
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group