From: | Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: reset implementation |
Date: | 2012-05-18 13:18:09 |
Message-ID: | 4FB64C11.8080705@dndg.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
On 18/05/12 11:53, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
>> > IMHO that's correct for connection.reset() but I don't know how many
>> > people out there are using NOTIFY and .reset() togheter and I don't want
>> > to break their code.
> My assumption is that if somebody calls reset() he doesn't expect the
> connection to keep on doing what it was before. But I've already
> created more than one issue thinking something wouldn't have had side
> effects, while in real world... so I don't want to push too much on
> this.
If nobody comment on this issue at all we can suppose the number of
affected people would be extremely low (and I know no big framework out
there uses connection.reset()). So it is a +1 unless someone objects.
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio federico(dot)digregorio(at)dndg(dot)it
Studio Associato Di Nunzio e Di Gregorio http://dndg.it
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy. -- Anonymous
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andy Casey | 2012-05-21 04:32:55 | Re: Using a psycopg2 converter to retrieve bytea data from PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2012-05-18 09:53:32 | Re: reset implementation |